Dodge Ram owners accuse Chrysler of misleading them about emissions – Los Angeles Times
The case was filed Monday in federal court in Detroit by Seattle law firm Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro. Four plaintiffs are named in the complaint, but Hagens Berman seeks to bring thousands of other owners into the case.
The suit alleges that the particulate emissions from the trucks were greater than Fiat Chrysler advertised. Attorneys contend that the trucks’ emissions caused catalytic converters to wear out more quickly, resulting in the vehicle burning fuel at a higher rate.
“The sheer level of fraud and concealment between Chrysler and Cummins is unconscionable, and we believe we have uncovered a deeply entrenched scheme,” Steve Berman, managing partner of Hagens Berman, said in a statement.
Fiat Chrysler said it is reviewing the complaint, adding: “Based on the information available to it, FCA US does not believe that the claims brought against it are meritorious. We will contest this lawsuit vigorously.”
Separately, Fiat Chrysler is cooperating with a recall that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and California Air Resources Board demanded for 2013 through 2015 model year Ram 2500 pickup trucks with 6.7-liter Cummins diesel engines. The agencies found that moisture can cause deactivation of the catalyst reduction system, causing excess nitrogen oxide emissions.
But in August the automaker sued Cummins for $60 million that Fiat Chrysler attorneys said the company has already spent to repair the emission systems on about 42,000 of the diesel trucks.
In September, Reuters reported that a Fiat Chrysler attorney estimated the eventual cost to be as high as $200 million.
The Hagens Berman case seeks to broaden the issue to include owners of Ram 2500 and 3500 diesels going back as far as the 2007 model year. The lawsuit also alleges that much of what Fiat Chrysler and Cummins did was similar to Volkswagen, which put devices in about 11 million diesel cars meant to deliberately cheat on emission tests.
The German automaker is facing penalties up to $19.5 billion. Similar charges have been made against Mercedes-Benz, but that company has denied them.
The recall of the Ram heavy-duty diesels is different from the Volkswagen case. FCA and Cummins contend that the problem involves a component that didn’t function as designed and that there was no intention to mislead regulators or consumers. They disagree over which of them is responsible.
Gardner writes for the Detroit Free Press/McClatchy.