Obama seeking to ‘fully reverse’ sequester cuts in budget plan – Fox News

Posted: Thursday, January 29, 2015
obama_hagel_012815.jpg

Jan. 28, 2015: President Obama, speaks during the farewell tribute in honor of outgoing Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, at Fort Myer-Henderson Hall in Fort Myer, Va. (AP)

President Obama will push to “fully reverse” the so-called sequester cuts as part of his upcoming budget plan, a proposal likely to anger fiscal conservatives who want to see spending limits in place. 

The across-the-board cuts, agreed to by both parties, have been in effect since 2013, after lawmakers were unable to produce a more strategic deficit-cutting plan. Members of both parties have problems with the cuts, since they indiscriminately affect both domestic and defense programs. 

But according to a White House official, Obama plans to call for a complete overhaul when he addresses the House Democratic Caucus in Philadelphia Thursday evening. 

“The president will propose to end the across-the-board sequester cuts that threaten our economy and our military,” the official said., adding that the budget “will fully reverse those cuts for domestic priorities,” while boosting national security programs by an equal amount. 

The White House claims that the budget will be “fully paid for with cuts to inefficient spending programs and closing tax loopholes,” but taxpayers will have to wait until the budget is formally released Monday to find out exactly how. 

The brazen proposal from the president, two months after voters booted his party from control of Congress, reflected the White House’s newfound confidence on the economy. Obama’s aides believe that improving conditions give Obama credibility to push his spending priorities unabashedly — despite the fact that Republicans still believe government spends far too much. 

Federal deficits, gas prices and unemployment are all falling, while Obama’s poll numbers have crept upward. The president has been newly combative as he argues it’s time to ease the harsh measures that were taken to help pull the economy out of recession. 

“The president believes we should end the era of manufactured crises and mindless austerity,” the White House said in a statement. 

But while deficits are falling, projections show $1 trillion deficits could return in the future and the national debt will continue rising to dangerous levels. 

Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, said earlier this week that deficits and debt remain on an “unsustainable” course. 

And while Obama’s budget proposal to spend more on things like education, sick leave and health care was sure to delight many members of his own party, it’s Republicans who now fully control all of Congress. 

“This is not a surprise,” said Don Stewart, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s deputy chief of staff. “Previous budgets submitted by the president have purported to reverse the bipartisan spending limits through tax increases that the Congress — even under Democrats — could never accept.” 

Yet Obama’s move also puts Republicans in a precarious position. 

Many in the GOP want to spend more on defense, especially amid new and growing threats from terrorism and extremist groups. But Republicans are divided about how to pay for it. While some have argued for ignoring the spending limits, others want to offset the hikes with cuts to either domestic programs or so-called mandatory programs like Social Security and Medicare. 

At a Senate hearing on Wednesday, the military chiefs of the Army, Navy, Air Force and Marines testified on the concerns over the budget cuts. 

“We will be forced to cut 150,000 active duty soldiers,” said Gen. Ray Odierno, the Army’s senior military leader. “Readiness has been degraded to the lowest level in 20 years,” he added. 

Pentagon documents obtained previously by The Associated Press showed Obama was expected to ask Congress for a roughly $38 billion boost for defense — an increase of nearly 8 percent, with some slight changes possible. Raising domestic spending by a similar amount would mean Obama’s budget proposal would be on track to exceed the levels frozen in place by sequestration by about $70 billion. 

By proposing to raise defense spending by the same dollar amount as domestic programs, Obama is putting the GOP on notice that he won’t accept cuts to his own priorities just to make way for more spending on national security programs that both parties are in the mood to support. 

The Pentagon’s base budget is currently $496 billion, plus another $64 billion for overseas missions. Obama’s increases would allow for new next-generation F-35 fighters, ships and submarines and long-range Air Force tankers. Military leaders have also said the earlier cuts forced reductions in flying hours, training and equipment maintenance. 

On the domestic side, Obama has proposed offering two free years of community college and creating new or expanded tax credits for child care and spouses who both work. He’s called for raising the top capital gains rate on some wealthy couples and consolidating education tax breaks, although some of those ideas have already faced intense opposition. 

“Until he gets serious about solving our long-term spending problem, it’s hard to take him seriously,” said Cory Fritz, a spokesman for House Speaker John Boehner. 

Still, the president’s budget proposal is just that — a proposal. 

The budget will frame Obama’s opening offer as Democrats and Republicans head toward an inevitable clash. It’s an agenda that Obama started selling in the run-up to his State of the Union address this month, and that House Democrats have sought to echo as they regroup after losing even more members in the midterms. 

In his meeting Thursday with House Democrats, Obama was also to insist that House Republicans not use a funding bill for the Homeland Security Department to try to quash the executive actions he took late last year on immigration and deportations. The White House called that a “dangerous view” that would risk the country’s national security. 

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Comments

Write a Reply or Comment:

Your email address will not be published.*